A+ R A-
Wednesday, 02 March 2011 00:00

A Comparison - Sony DSC-F828 vs. Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000I bet when you read the title of this blog, you were probably thinking - this is about the most obvious comparison ever done.You're right - it is.

However, what I wanted to do was to point out that just because something is brand new does not always make it superior in every way...

After 7 years of using my old Sony DSC-828 camera, I finally made the decision that it was time to upgrade, especially since I have begun successfully selling photography prints. After weeks of researching camera bodies that had features I wanted, I made a decision to go with the Nikon D7000 two weeks ago, and boy I have not been disappointed! So far, images are cleaner, they don't have the nasty chromatic abberations my old Sony had, and the feature list is a mile long. Moving up from an 8 megapixel sensor to a 16.2 megapixel sensor has been amazing. I'm already hatching plans to do star trail photography, long exposure photos, and other nifty tricks I could only have dreamed of doing on my old Sony.

Don't get me wrong, I loved my Sony and it still has a lot of life left in it, but for the quality of stuff I need to produce to continue to sell prints, a change was needed. Let's compare the two cameras, side-by-side - green indicates winner (stats courtesy of dpreview.com, an amazing camera review website):

CAMERA
Sony DSC-F828
Nikon D7000
Format
Compact
Interchangeable lens camera, SLR
Price (new)
$1000.00 (in 2004)
$1,700 with 18-105mm kit lens
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4928 x 3264
Effective pixels 8.0megapixels 16.2megapixels
Sensor photo detectors 8.3megapixels 16.9megapixels
Sensor size 2/3 " (8.80 x 6.60 mm, 0.58 cm²) 23.1 x 15.4 mm (3.55 cm²)
Pixel density 14 MP/cm² 4.6 MP/cm²
ISO rating Auto, 64, 100, 200, 400, 800 100 - 6400 in 1, 1/2 or 1/3 EV steps (100 - 25600 with boost)
Auto Focus Multi-Point AF (5 area), Center AF, Spot AF (flexible) 39 area (9 cross type) TTL phase detection with AF fine tuning
White balance override 5 positions plus manual 12 positions, plus manual and kelvin
Min shutter 30sec 30sec (up to ? with bulb setting)
Max shutter 1/3200sec 1/8000sec
Exposure compensation -2 to +2 EV in 1/3 EV Steps -5 to +5 EV in 1/2 or 1/3 EV steps
Movie Clips Yes, MPEG VX (640 x 480, 16/30 fps, unlimited) Yes, 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (24, 25, 30fps), 640 x 424 (24fps)
Timelapse recording No Yes
Orientation sensor No Yes
LCD 1.8" 3"
LCD Dots 134,000 921,000
Live View Yes, with histogram
Yes
HDMI No Yes
Wireless No Yes
GPS No Yes
Environmentally sealed No Yes, Weather and dust resistant
Weight (inc. batteries) 906g 780g (1,200g with kit lens)

OK so, let's be honest. The Nikon D7000 blows the Sony out of the water, clearly. This isn't even a full list of features, either. The image quality difference is just absurd. Here are two shots I took tonight, one with the Sony and one with the Nikon.

This is the one taken with the Sony. Mouse over it to see the image taken by the Nikon.

Comarison image between Nikon D7000 and Sony DSC-F828

Both were set using auto settings. The Nikon clearly shined in the darker room, where it needed to lower ISO to 1600 (the Sony only goes up to ISO 800). It captured far more sharpness in the image than the Sony, not to mention resolution. Low light is where the D7000 really shines.

All in all, the Nikon D7000 rules. I am going to love my new options available to me - long exposure shots, interval shooting, in-camera processing, a larger ISO range, interchangable lenses... the list goes on and on. I will miss two things about my Sony though: in live-view shooting (with the LCD on), the Sony could show you a live histogram of your composed shot, as well as the actual way it will look after the shot is made. The histogram is a wonderful tool to determine exposure accuracy. The Nikon has a similar feature in the viewfinder, but it is not as robust. Lastly, the Sony would also show the focal length of your focus, so you always knew if you were properly focused at infinity for good landscapes. Other than that, I welcome the new challenges the Nikon D7000 presents to me.  It has already challenged me to look at countless articles online on photography techniques and composition, etc. It has literally renewed my interest in photography at a higher level. I can't wait to see what it can do this summer for my backpacking trips! If you want to upgrade your camera, a great place to check out is Adorama.com, and best of all, if you shop there, it helps support this site.

Follow me on Facebook or Twitter to stay up-to-date on reviews, climbs and more.

Last modified on Wednesday, 09 March 2011 20:33
Matt Payne

Matt Payne

Website: www.100summits.com E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments

0 G 2011-03-23 13:22 #1
Why'd you go with the D7000 rather than, say, the D5000?
Quote
0 Matt Payne 2011-03-24 21:16 #2
The D7000 has all of the features I wanted in a camera plus a really nice sensor. The sensor in the D7000 is significantly better than the one in the D5000.
Quote

Add comment

Please keep comments friendly and clean!


Security code Refresh

Support 100Summits

Support 100Summits

Sign up to get updates! Stay connected

Sign up to get updates on trip reports, gallery additions and site features!
JoomlaWatch Stats 1.2.9 by Matej Koval